Skip to main content
Datacloud Awards

Datacloud Awards

5 June, 2025

Palais des Festivals et des Congrès

Cannes, France

Book Your Ticket       Submit Your Nomination

 

Our Judging Process

The portal for submissions opens on December 11 and remains open for entries until March 3. During this time judges are contacted and briefed on the process and timing.  

Once the portal is closed for submissions, the Chair of the judging panel allocates the award categories to each judge, based on their expertise and category preferences. If the allocations cause conflict of interest, appropriate changes are made. The judges have between 3 and 4 weeks to score their allocated award categories. They score the submissions on their own, with no interference or conferring. At no stage is there any contact with the Datacloud commercial teams.

Once all the scores are added up, the shortlists are created based on a minimum score that needs to be attained to qualify. The top aggregate score per category is the winner. In cases of a tiebreaker, the Chair will conduct it by scoring the tied submissions. If the Chair has a conflict of interest, another judge is selected to break the tie. On the rare occasions where the tie cannot be broken, more than one winner may be named.  

If a category does not receive the required about of submissions/meet the minimum score, the category will be dropped to ensure it stays fair and consistent.

Grading Criteria

Each question will be able to gain up to 5 points, following the below criteria:

 

5 points - Excellent

All the points in the question have been answered and tailored to the related award and have been made convincingly, the flow of the answer is clear, concise and easily understandable, data and examples provided are relevant and on point. The video presentation respects the two minutes and shares the right information to support the submission.

4 points - Above Average

All the points in the question have been answered, data and examples provided are relevant, but language is fragmented, and clarity of the answer is affected and not totally convincing. The video has been submitted and shares the right message but doesn’t respect the 2 minutes length.

3 points - Average

Only around 2/3 of the question has been answered and the data and examples provided are not that clear and on point; language is fragmented, and clarity of the answer is affected. The video has been included, and it has been done for the submission, however, it does not respect the allowed length and/or does not explain the submission clearly.

2 points - Below Average

Less than half of the question has been answered and data and examples provided do not meet the standard expected to support the submission; language is fragmented, and clarity of the answer is affected. The video does not provide information on why the business/person should receive the award.

1 point - Poor

The response is clearly the result of copy-paste from a corporate website, it hasn’t been thought through and adapted to the specific category/award, and/or the answer is not specific and targeted to the award's criteria, not reflecting the specifics of the category. The video is not original to the submission and does not provide the right information.

Interested in attending Datacloud Global Awards 2025?

Don’t miss the chance to be part of the prestigious Datacloud Global Awards 2025! Join the top leaders, innovators, and visionaries from the world of data, cloud, and digital infrastructure for an unforgettable evening celebrating excellence across the industry.

Enquire Today